8wQV…pump: who launched it and how coins like it went
8wQVzbs1AMGMinWPn1nsma8rxAEUNWnM1AqiTEKppump
Quick answer
Rules say: skip. serial_launcher: the deployer has 651 launches, 5 graduated, 0 in the last day. deployer_sells_fast: over its last ~10 days the deployer bought 100% of its 62 launches as it created them and sold out of 60% of those within 10 seconds (median 5 s): the first buyers after it buy what it sells. one_wallet_bought: 10 seconds after launch, the deployer held 78.6% of the supply, and 4 other wallets 0.8% between them. insiders: the deployer and its first buyers hold 69.1% of the supply. lookalikes_die: 349 of 366 launches like it were dead within a day.
8wQVzbs1AMGMinWPn1nsma8rxAEUNWnM1AqiTEKppump was launched on Oct 21, 2026 by satoshid33F5UWoeCy6itHuWUodVUT1pPwbdHM3yti6, a wallet with 651 pump.fun launches on record (this one included) and 5 graduated; before this coin, its best had peaked at $592,090. Over its 62 launches of the last ~10 days, it bought 100.0% of them as it created them and had sold out of 60% of those within 10 seconds (median 5 s), +78 SOL on those paired with SOL, before fees. Its bonding curve is quoted in PUMP, pump.fun's token, not SOL; its SOL figures are that token's amounts at its price in SOL at the hour, and with no price for it they are missing. Ten seconds after launch, the deployer held 78.6% of the supply, the whole bonding curve, and 4 other wallets 0.8% between them. The deployer and those first buyers still hold 69.1% of the supply, net of what they sold, so most of it sits with the wallets that launched it. The biggest wallet, BLU1pLwcB5dAZ1MpS3U2KAAi3nPkyRpS2wEyiDbieAuF, holds 0.34% of the supply (on chain, 2026-10-31 17:36 UTC). Of 366 past launches that looked like it at 240 minutes old, 100% graduated, 95% had no trade a day later, the median peaked at 1.00x over the next day.
The deployer
satoshid33F5UWoeCy6itHuWUodVUT1pPwbdHM3yti6 · its page · the serial deployers · do serial deployers' coins run?
At launch
Who funded the buyers (not built yet)
We are deciding whether to add this. For this coin's first buyers and top holders: which wallet funded each one, which of them share a funder, and how those wallets and their funders did in earlier pump.fun launches (how many coins they were early in, and how those coins went). It is not built. If you would use it, press the button: it counts one vote and nothing else (no sign-up, no email).
Launches that looked like this
366 past launches, from any deployer, looked like it at 240 minutes old: a deployer with 21+ launches and 1+ graduated before, 4-10 buyers in the first 10 s, insiders 60%+ of supply, and curve at_launch.
The closest past launches
- DgaG1qjdcTdcffTdpfhuJww6K6NRXZggPeXQFyhUpump: peak 1.00x, close 1.00x a day on, dead (same deployer)
- FgxUwLV49uH6mjGrbDmwp7XAN16eyXNsiLDtpBYipump: peak 1.00x, close 1.00x a day on, dead (same deployer)
- 3JanfYYnvh4rew7HYx5EXxhF8SUYvrfVan7oX6Twpump: peak 1.00x, close 1.00x a day on, dead (same deployer)
Questions
Is the coin 8wQV…pump the real $CUPSEY?
Is this the real $CUPSEY? The first pump.fun coin with that ticker was 5PsnNwPmMtsGZgG6ZqMoDJJi28BR5xpAotXHHiQhpump, created 2024-11-03. 75 other graduated coins use the ticker; the biggest, eRqhowzUbT8pG8t8XUBur7EbhTVpt5iJt19QBKZpump, peaked at $27,176,549 on its first day. In the last 14 days $CUPSEY was launched 204 times (this one included) by 144 deployers; 47 of those deployers usually sell their own coins within 10 seconds of creating them.
Who launched the coin 8wQV…pump?
The wallet satoshid33F5UWoeCy6itHuWUodVUT1pPwbdHM3yti6, on Oct 21, 2026. It has 651 pump.fun launches on record, this one included, and 5 of them graduated. Before this coin, its best had peaked at $592,090.
Does the deployer of the coin 8wQV…pump sell its own coins?
Over its 62 launches of the last ~10 days, it bought 100.0% of them as it created them and had sold out of 60% of those within 10 seconds (median 5 s), +78 SOL on those paired with SOL, before fees. The buyers in a coin's first seconds are the ones it sells to.
Was the coin 8wQV…pump bundled at launch?
Ten seconds after launch, the deployer held 78.6% of the supply, the whole bonding curve, and 4 other wallets 0.8% between them: the coin graduated on one wallet's buy, not a bundle of many. Since pump.fun's BOOST mode (Jul 2026), about half of all graduates are bought out like this in their first seconds.
Do the insiders still hold the coin 8wQV…pump?
The deployer and the first-10-second buyers hold 69.1% of the supply, net of what they sold. That is a majority: if they sell into the pool at once, the price falls with it.
Who holds most of the coin 8wQV…pump?
The biggest wallet, BLU1pLwcB5dAZ1MpS3U2KAAi3nPkyRpS2wEyiDbieAuF, holds 0.34% of the supply (on chain, 2026-10-31 17:36 UTC). Wallets only: the bonding curve and the pools are left out.
How did launches like the coin 8wQV…pump go?
366 past launches looked like it at 240 minutes old (the deployer's record, the first 10 seconds, the insiders' share and the curve). 100% of them graduated, 95% had no trade a day later, the median peaked at 1.00x over the next day and the top tenth at 1.00x.
Is the coin 8wQV…pump a rug?
This check gives no verdict. Three facts decide it: who holds the supply, whether they have sold, and how launches like it went, all above. A coin launched through pump.fun's program has no freeze authority and no sell tax, so anyone can sell; the risk is the holders who can sell first.
Check another coin
On Telegram: paste a contract address to @pumpdatafun_bot for this check in a second, and /watch a dev for their next launch.
Numbers from every pump.fun trade, ever, not advice and never a verdict. The same answers by API: the pump.fun API, 300 calls a day free under /free/ with no key, 2,000 a day with a key; for a bot, the pre-buy check is the same three calls in Python; in Grok, a Grok bot template. Not affiliated with pump.fun.